Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-01-03

Satish P. Bhatt vs The State Of Maharashtra

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satish P. Bhatt
Respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Author
Vikram Nath
Bench
Rajesh Bindal, Vikram Nath

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to cancel the bail and suspend the sentence of the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, due to his failure to comply with financial obligations and court orders. The Court emphasized the importance of adherence to judicial directives and the consequences of non-compliance, affirming that repeated disregard for legal responsibilities undermines judicial efficacy. The appeal was dismissed, reinforcing the High Court's stance on accountability in financial matters.

Satish P. Bhatt vs The State Of Maharashtra · Niyam