Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-02-07

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD vs TARSEM LAL

Citation / case number
SC 2018/44467
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD
Respondent
TARSEM LAL
Author
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH B.V. NAGARATHNA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of house allotment for Scheduled Tribes under the Chandigarh Housing Board Regulations, specifically Regulation 25. The Court held that the absence of a Presidential notification under Article 342 for Scheduled Tribes in Chandigarh does not preclude the provision of a minimum reservation of 5% for them, as clarified by the Chandigarh Administration. The Court upheld the trial court's decree favoring the respondent, affirming their entitlement to the allotment despite the administrative confusion.

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD vs TARSEM LAL · Niyam