Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-02-07

Chandigarh Housing Board vs Tarsem Lal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Chandigarh Housing Board
Respondent
Tarsem Lal
Author
B.V. Nagarathna
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's decree that the Chandigarh Housing Board was obliged to reserve a minimum of 5% of dwelling units for Scheduled Tribes, as per the clarification letter dated 21.09.1983, despite the absence of a Presidential notification under Article 342 for Scheduled Tribes in Chandigarh. The Court emphasized that the lack of a notification does not negate the entitlement of Scheduled Tribes to housing reservations. The appeal by the Chandigarh Housing Board was dismissed, affirming the rights of the Scheduled Tribes applicants.

Chandigarh Housing Board vs Tarsem Lal · Niyam