Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-02-07

Sudhir Vikas Kalel vs Bapu Rajaram Kalel

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Sudhir Vikas Kalel
Respondent
Bapu Rajaram Kalel
Author
Vikram Nath
Bench
Vikram Nath

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of a No Confidence Motion against Sushila Sitaram Kalel, the Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat, focusing on whether Appellant No. 1 was entitled to vote based on the Maharashtra Temporary Extension Act, 2023. The Court held that if Appellant No. 1 was covered under Sections 3 and 4 of the Temporary Extension Act, his election would be validated, nullifying the No Confidence Motion. Conversely, if he was not entitled to the benefits of the Act, the motion would stand carried, thus determining the outcome of the appeal.

Sudhir Vikas Kalel vs Bapu Rajaram Kalel · Niyam