Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-02-29

High Court Bar Association Allahabad vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 150
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
High Court Bar Association Allahabad
Respondent
The State Of Uttar Pradesh
Author
Abhay S. Oka
Bench
Pankaj Mithal, Abhay S. Oka

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the High Court has the jurisdiction to vacate or modify interim relief orders, emphasizing that such orders should not automatically lapse due to the passage of time. The Court reiterated the importance of timely justice, particularly in cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and clarified that the power to grant stay must be exercised with restraint and accountability. The judgment referred the matter to a larger bench for reconsideration of the principles established in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation regarding the nature of orders framing charges.

High Court Bar Association Allahabad vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh · Niyam