Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-12-11

Arjun S/O Ratan Gaikwad vs The State Of Maharashtra

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 968
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Arjun S/O Ratan Gaikwad
Respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Author
B.R. Gavai
Bench
B.R. Gavai

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons Engaged in Black-Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981 (MPDA Act) was invalid as the activities of the appellant did not affect public order. The Court found that the six cases against the appellant, which were the basis for the detention, did not demonstrate a nexus with public order threats and could be addressed through ordinary law enforcement. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the detention order was quashed.

Arjun S/O Ratan Gaikwad vs The State Of Maharashtra · Niyam