Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-12-19

State Of U.P vs Sandeep Agarwal

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 1015
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Sandeep Agarwal
Author
Abhay S. Oka
Bench
Abhay S. Oka

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to quash the termination of doctors' services under clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India, ruling that the State failed to demonstrate that conducting a disciplinary inquiry was impracticable. The Court emphasized that the prolonged pendency of the respondents' applications for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) without resolution rendered the termination illegal. The Court affirmed the High Court's orders for reinstatement and consideration of VRS applications, thereby reinforcing the need for due process in employment termination cases.

State Of U.P vs Sandeep Agarwal · Niyam