Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-12-09

Jami Venkata Suryaprabha vs Tarini Prasad Nayak

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 1001
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Jami Venkata Suryaprabha
Respondent
Tarini Prasad Nayak

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the application of Order XVIII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, which grants the plaintiff the right to begin unless the defendant admits the facts and raises a legal contention. The Court held that the trial court's rejection of the plaintiffs' application to lead oral evidence was justified, as the defendants had disputed the agreement of sale. Consequently, the High Court's refusal to intervene was upheld, affirming the lower courts' decisions.

Jami Venkata Suryaprabha vs Tarini Prasad Nayak · Niyam