Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2024

Supreme Court of India · 2024-04-08

Yash Tuteja vs Union Of India

Citation / case number
2024 INSC 301
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Yash Tuteja
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Abhay S.Oka
Bench
Abhay S. Oka

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that for an offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) to be made out, there must be a scheduled offence as defined under clause (y) of sub-Section (1) of Section 2 of the PMLA. The Court clarified that conspiracy under Section 120B IPC can only be a scheduled offence if it involves an offence specifically included in the PMLA Schedule. Since the alleged offences in the complaint, except for Section 120B IPC, are not scheduled offences, the complaint under ECIR/RPZO/11/2022 was deemed invalid, and the absence of a scheduled offence negates the existence of proceeds of crime necessary for PMLA applicability.

Yash Tuteja vs Union Of India · Niyam