Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-09-13

B.C NAGARAJ vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT HIGHER EDUCATION

Citation / case number
SC 2017/38357
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
B.C NAGARAJ
Respondent
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT HIGHER EDUCATION
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether physical education directors and similar personnel, who were granted revised UGC pay scales with retrospective effect from 1996, are entitled to other government benefits under the relevant orders. The court analyzed the scope of pay revision orders and their implications on additional benefits, ultimately emphasizing the importance of clear statutory provisions for such benefits. The judgment clarified the legal position regarding retrospective pay scales and associated benefits for government employees. The court upheld the government's position that benefits beyond pay revision require explicit statutory backing.

B.C NAGARAJ vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT HIGHER EDUCATION · Niyam