ROHIT CHAUDHARYAND . vs M/S. VIPUL LTD.

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the term 'Commercial Purpose' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, in the context of a dispute involving the sale of a commercial space. The court analyzed whether the transaction was for a commercial purpose within the meaning of the Act, considering the facts of the sale and transfer of shares in the commercial complex. The judgment clarified the scope of 'Commercial Purpose' and its application to such transactions. The court ultimately provided guidance on the interpretation of the term in consumer protection law.