Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-09-05

PRAKASH BANG vs GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMA. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2012/23480
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRAKASH BANG
Respondent
GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMA. LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which dismissed the consumer complaint filed by the appellant alleging defect and negligence in the vaccine administered. The court examined whether the appellant proved any deficiency in service or defect in the drug that caused harm. The NCDRC found no such evidence, and the Supreme Court concurred with this assessment, dismissing the appeal. The judgment emphasizes the importance of proof of defect or negligence in consumer protection claims related to pharmaceuticals.

PRAKASH BANG vs GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMA. LTD. · Niyam