Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-10-16

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2023/8361
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the designation of Advocates as Senior Advocates under the Advocates Act, 1961, and Supreme Court Rules, 2013. The petitioners challenged this classification as violative of equality under Article 14, and the rights under Articles 19 and 21, alleging it creates an exclusive class benefiting certain groups, thus leading to discrimination and monopolization. The Court analyzed whether such designations amount to unconstitutional discrimination or judicial legislation, considering prior judgments and modifications to the designation process.

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam