Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-05-03

M.K. RAJAGOPALAN vs DR. PERIASAMY PALANI GOUNDER

Citation / case number
SC 2022/6012
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.K. RAJAGOPALAN
Respondent
DR. PERIASAMY PALANI GOUNDER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the procedural and substantive aspects of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The case involved the approval of a resolution plan by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) and its subsequent disapproval by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The Court analyzed whether the appellate tribunal's decision was justified and upheld the statutory scheme of the IBC, emphasizing the importance of the resolution process for insolvency resolution. The Court ultimately clarified the scope of appellate review and upheld the authority of the NCLAT in such matters.

M.K. RAJAGOPALAN vs DR. PERIASAMY PALANI GOUNDER · Niyam