Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-03-03

THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS vs DR. MAHINDRA BHASKAR LIMAYE

Citation / case number
SC 2021/26304
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
Respondent
DR. MAHINDRA BHASKAR LIMAYE
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of certain rules under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which were challenged for being arbitrary, unreasonable, and violative of Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. The Court analyzed whether the eligibility criteria for appointment of State Commission Chairpersons and Members, as prescribed in Rules 3(2)(b), 4(2)(c), and 6(9), were justified. It upheld the rules, emphasizing the importance of qualifications and experience for such appointments, and held that the rules did not violate constitutional principles.

THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS vs DR. MAHINDRA BHASKAR LIMAYE · Niyam