Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-03-23

UNION OF INDIA vs M/S. BHARAT ENTERPRISE

Citation / case number
SC 2014/37111
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
M/S. BHARAT ENTERPRISE
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the respondent contractor's claim for payment, made after a significant delay and accompanied by affidavits and undertakings, was valid for arbitration. The court analyzed the contractual obligations, the conduct of the parties, and the timing of the claims and payments. It held that the respondent's revocation of affidavits and the subsequent invocation of arbitration were justified, and the arbitration clause was validly invoked. The court emphasized the importance of timely claims and adherence to contractual procedures in arbitration disputes.

UNION OF INDIA vs M/S. BHARAT ENTERPRISE · Niyam