Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-03-02

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX vs M/S. KUMAR PAINTS AND MILL STORES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR

Citation / case number
SC 2010/3376
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX
Respondent
M/S. KUMAR PAINTS AND MILL STORES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the mixing of base paint with different colours, through a computerized process, constitutes 'manufacture' under Section 2(e)(i) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The Court considered the arguments that such mixing does not produce a new recognizable product and thus should not be taxed as manufacture, versus the Revenue's view that it results in a new product subject to taxation. The High Court previously held in favor of the assessees, a decision that was remitted for reconsideration after expert opinions. The Court ultimately upheld the view that the process does not amount to 'manufacture' and therefore does not create a new taxable product.

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX vs M/S. KUMAR PAINTS AND MILL STORES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR · Niyam