Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-03-29

CCE, AURANGABAD vs M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR

Citation / case number
SC 2009/17797
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CCE, AURANGABAD
Respondent
M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the classification of imported LCD panels used in electronic and automobile applications. The key issue was whether these panels should be classified under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices or under headings related to television parts or car audio/video players. The Court upheld the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), affirming the classification under CH 9013.8010, emphasizing the functional use and manufacturing context of the goods. The judgment clarifies the principles of classification based on the primary use and description of goods in customs tariff entries.

CCE, AURANGABAD vs M/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. ITS DIRECTOR · Niyam