Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-03-29

Cce, Aurangabad vs M/S Videocon Industries Ltd. Thr. Its ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Cce, Aurangabad
Respondent
M/S Videocon Industries Ltd. Thr. Its ...
Author
S. Ravindra Bhat
Bench
S. Ravindra Bhat, Dipankar Datta

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the classification of LCD panels imported by Videocon, which the CESTAT classified under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, contrary to the revenue's classification under heading 85.29 as parts of television sets. The court analyzed the tariff entries and the nature of the goods, ultimately affirming the classification that best fits the product's characteristics. The judgment clarifies the principles of classification under Customs Tariff and the importance of functional and descriptive analysis of goods. The court upheld the CESTAT's order, supporting the classification as Liquid Crystal Devices.

Cce, Aurangabad vs M/S Videocon Industries Ltd. Thr. Its ... · Niyam