Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-01-04

SABARMATI GAS LIMITED vs SHAH ALLOYS LIMITED

Citation / case number
SC 2020/4480
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SABARMATI GAS LIMITED
Respondent
SHAH ALLOYS LIMITED
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the period of limitation for an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, can exclude the suspension period of the operational creditor’s rights under Section 22(1) of the SICA, and whether a pre-existing dispute can justify dismissing such an application. The court analyzed the interplay between IBC and SICA provisions, emphasizing the importance of the limitation period and dispute resolution. The judgment clarified the legal position on exclusion of suspension periods and the nature of disputes that can bar insolvency proceedings, ultimately providing guidance on procedural and substantive issues in insolvency law.

SABARMATI GAS LIMITED vs SHAH ALLOYS LIMITED · Niyam