Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-01-13

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT vs RATTAN INDIA POWER LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR

Citation / case number
SC 2016/28925
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Respondent
RATTAN INDIA POWER LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether a party to a contract can question the consideration amount after signing, especially when the party had previously agreed to and issued an undertaking for a specific consideration. The Court held that the respondent was estopped from challenging the amount due to prior communications and contractual obligations. The case involved a dispute over irrigation restoration charges, which had been previously litigated and dismissed. The Court upheld the contractual agreement and the earlier High Court decision, emphasizing the binding nature of contractual commitments.

THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT vs RATTAN INDIA POWER LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR · Niyam