Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-01-24

Baharul Islam . vs The Indian Medical Association

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Baharul Islam .
Respondent
The Indian Medical Association
Author
B.V. Nagarathna
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna, B.R. Gavai

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of provisions related to medical registration and regulation under Indian law, particularly focusing on the interplay between central and state legislations. The court analyzed the scope of Entry 66 of List I and Entry 25 of List III, along with relevant provisions of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, and the Assam Rural Health Regulatory Authority Act, 2004. The judgment upheld the constitutional scheme and clarified the legal framework governing medical practitioners and authorities. The court ultimately dismissed the challenge, affirming the validity of the statutory provisions involved.

Baharul Islam . vs The Indian Medical Association · Niyam