Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-02-10

Central Board Of Dawooodi Bohra ... vs The State Of Maharashtra

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Central Board Of Dawooodi Bohra ...
Respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Author
Abhay S. Oka
Bench
J. K. Maheshwari, Vikram Nath, Abhay S. Oka, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined whether the principles established in the 1962 case of Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v. State of Bombay, regarding the constitutional validity of the Bombay Protection of Ex-communication Act, require reconsideration. The Court analyzed the jurisdiction under Article 32 and the implications of ex-communication within religious communities. The judgment focused on constitutional protections and the limits of state interference in religious practices. The Court upheld the earlier principles, emphasizing the importance of religious freedom balanced with constitutional mandates.

Central Board Of Dawooodi Bohra ... vs The State Of Maharashtra · Niyam