Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-12-14

MANIK HIRU JHANGIANI vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2016/27038
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANIK HIRU JHANGIANI
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of proceedings initiated under the repealed Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, in light of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The Court analyzed whether penalties and punishments under the old law remain applicable after its repeal, emphasizing that Section 97 of the FSSA preserves such penalties despite the repeal. The Court upheld the continuation of proceedings and penalties under the old law for offences committed prior to the repeal, affirming the legal continuity and the applicability of penalties.

MANIK HIRU JHANGIANI vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH · Niyam