Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2023

Supreme Court of India · 2023-04-10

R. HEMALATHA vs KASHTHURI

Citation / case number
SC 2022/18251
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
R. HEMALATHA
Respondent
KASHTHURI
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the High Court's order that quashed the Trial Court's decision regarding the admissibility of an unregistered agreement for the sale of immovable property. The Court held that the Tamil Nadu Amendment Act No. 29 of 2012 mandates registration for agreements of sale valued at Rs. 100 and above, making unregistered documents inadmissible in evidence. Consequently, the Court reinstated the Trial Court's order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory requirements for the registration of such documents.

R. HEMALATHA vs KASHTHURI · Niyam