Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-09-07

BABANRAO RAJARAM PUND vs M/S SAMARTH BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS

Citation / case number
SC 2021/22341
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BABANRAO RAJARAM PUND
Respondent
M/S SAMARTH BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of Clause 18 in a Development Agreement regarding its sufficiency to constitute a legal arbitration agreement. The court examined the terms of the agreement and the intentions of the parties involved in the construction of 'Amay Apartments'. It concluded that the clause did indeed provide the necessary legal framework for arbitration, thereby upholding the enforceability of the arbitration agreement.

BABANRAO RAJARAM PUND vs M/S SAMARTH BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS · Niyam