Anil Kumar Modi vs Tarsem Kumar Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the High Court affirming the Additional District Judge's ruling in favor of the respondent-plaintiff regarding an injunction against the appellants-defendants. The court found that the respondent had a right to the passage based on a sale deed, but did not have the exclusive right to construct a toilet, as the appellants held easementary rights. The judgment clarified the balance of rights concerning the shared passage between the parties.