Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-10-21

DR. AJIT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation / case number
SC 2022/23239
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DR. AJIT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Respondent
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, a member of the Indian Forest Services, who challenged the decision to keep his promotion candidacy in a sealed cover without justification. The Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order, which mandated the opening of the sealed cover and implementation of the promotion recommendations, citing the absence of any pending departmental inquiry as a key factor. The judgment reinforced the principles of fair administrative action and transparency in promotion processes.

DR. AJIT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA vs THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH · Niyam