Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-10-14

SUNITA BURMAN vs THE COMMISSIONER M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Citation / case number
SC 2020/10544
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUNITA BURMAN
Respondent
THE COMMISSIONER M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
Bench
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the appellant, Sunita Burman, regarding her entitlement to family pension and retiral dues following the death of her husband, who was employed by the M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board. The court found that the denial of pension based on the classification of her husband's employment was unjust, emphasizing the need for equitable treatment of employees and their families. Consequently, the court directed the Housing Board to grant the family pension and other dues to the appellant.

SUNITA BURMAN vs THE COMMISSIONER M.P. HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE · Niyam