Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-10-11

Vijay Rajmohan vs State Represented By The Inspector Of ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vijay Rajmohan
Respondent
State Represented By The Inspector Of ...
Author
A.S. Bopanna
Bench
Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed two pivotal legal questions regarding the sanction for prosecution of a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act. It ruled that consulting the Central Vigilance Commission does not render the sanction order illegal, and clarified that the three-month period for the Appointing Authority to decide on the sanction request is not mandatory. Consequently, the court upheld the High Court's decision to allow the State's revision petition against the discharge of the appellant.

Vijay Rajmohan vs State Represented By The Inspector Of ... · Niyam