Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-05-17

SUDHIR RANJAN PATRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS vs HIMANSU SEKHAR SRICHANDAN

Citation / case number
SC 2022/5249
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUDHIR RANJAN PATRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS
Respondent
HIMANSU SEKHAR SRICHANDAN
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals concerning the High Court's order that confirmed the trial court's decision to set aside an ex-parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC. The court ruled that while the ex-parte decree was rightly set aside, the appellants (defendants) could not be allowed to file their written statement due to their failure to do so in a timely manner. The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to procedural timelines in civil litigation.

SUDHIR RANJAN PATRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS vs HIMANSU SEKHAR SRICHANDAN · Niyam