Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-05-20

M.L. PATIL (DEAD) THR LRS. vs THE STATE OF GOA

Citation / case number
SC 2020/28175
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.L. PATIL (DEAD) THR LRS.
Respondent
THE STATE OF GOA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision that the retirement age for the appellants was 60 years instead of 58 years, thus ruling that their premature retirement was incorrect. However, the Court concurred with the High Court's denial of back wages for the two additional years of service due to the belated approach of the writ petitioners. The appellants are entitled to pension benefits based on the revised retirement age, effective from January 1, 2020, but not to any arrears.

M.L. PATIL (DEAD) THR LRS. vs THE STATE OF GOA · Niyam