Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-05-05

SWADESH KUMAR AGARWAL vs DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL

Citation / case number
SC 2017/39399
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SWADESH KUMAR AGARWAL
Respondent
DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning the termination of a sole Arbitrator's mandate under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, due to undue delay in proceedings. The High Court had substituted the Arbitrator and appointed a new one, which was upheld by the Supreme Court. The court confirmed the dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, affirming the High Court's decision on the grounds of procedural delays in arbitration.

SWADESH KUMAR AGARWAL vs DINESH KUMAR AGARWAL · Niyam