Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-05-18

Bbr (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs S.P. Singhla Constructions Private ...

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Bbr (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
S.P. Singhla Constructions Private ...
Author
Ajay Rastogi
Bench
Ajay Rastogi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a change in the location of arbitration proceedings, due to the appointment of a new arbitrator, alters the jurisdictional seat of arbitration. The court held that the jurisdictional seat remains fixed at Panchkula, as determined by the first arbitrator, despite the new proceedings being conducted in Delhi. This ruling clarifies the implications of arbitrator appointments on the seat of arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Bbr (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs S.P. Singhla Constructions Private ... · Niyam