Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-05-20

M.L. Patil (Dead) vs The State Of Goa

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M.L. Patil (Dead)
Respondent
The State Of Goa
Author
M.R. Shah
Bench
B.V. Nagarathna, M.R. Shah

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeal concerning the retirement age of the original writ petitioners, confirming that they were wrongfully superannuated at 58 years instead of the stipulated 60 years. While the court upheld the High Court's finding on the retirement age, it concurred with the decision to deny back wages due to the belated approach of the petitioners. The outcome affirmed the High Court's ruling on the pension adjustments effective from January 1, 2020.

M.L. Patil (Dead) vs The State Of Goa · Niyam