Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-03-30

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KARNAL vs M/S. MEHTA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Citation / case number
SC 2020/23287
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KARNAL
Respondent
M/S. MEHTA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in a contractual dispute between Haryana Urban Development Authority and M/s. Mehta Construction Company regarding the completion of work under an agreement. The court noted the conflicting claims of delay responsibility and the subsequent arbitration application filed by the respondent. The order emphasizes the need for resolution through arbitration as stipulated in the contract, thereby reinforcing the arbitration process under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KARNAL vs M/S. MEHTA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY · Niyam