Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-06-16

KRISHNA RAI (DEAD) vs BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR

Citation / case number
SC 2016/31493
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KRISHNA RAI (DEAD)
Respondent
BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the conflict between the principles of estoppel and acquiescence and statutory service rules regarding the promotion of Class-IV employees to Class-III at Banaras Hindu University. The Court noted that while the Single Judge upheld the statutory rules, the Division Bench had set aside this judgment by applying estoppel and acquiescence. Ultimately, the Supreme Court was called to review the applicability of these principles over the statutory provisions governing promotions.

KRISHNA RAI (DEAD) vs BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY THROUGH REGISTRAR · Niyam