Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-02-23

HORTICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION GONIKOPPAL COORG vs THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION

Citation / case number
SC 2010/16638
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
HORTICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION GONIKOPPAL COORG
Respondent
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the recovery of damages for non-compliance with the Employees Provident Fund & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The court emphasized that once an employer fails to deposit the required EPF contributions, the levy of damages becomes mandatory. The appellant's failure to comply with the Act from 1975 to 1988 justified the recovery of assessed dues and damages as per the provisions of the Act.

HORTICULTURE EXPERIMENT STATION GONIKOPPAL COORG vs THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION · Niyam