Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2022

Supreme Court of India · 2022-12-05

COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX ROHTAK vs M/S. MERINO PANEL PRODUCT LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2018/20770
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX ROHTAK
Respondent
M/S. MERINO PANEL PRODUCT LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, which had set aside the show cause notice issued by the Revenue for incorrect valuation of related party transactions under the Central Excise Act. The court found that the method of valuation employed by the Revenue was not in accordance with the statutory provisions, particularly regarding the definition of related parties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the CESTAT's ruling.

COMMISSIONER OF CENTAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX ROHTAK vs M/S. MERINO PANEL PRODUCT LTD. · Niyam