Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-10-29

The State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Jammu And Kashmir
Respondent
Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman
Author
M.R. Shah
Bench
A.S. Bopanna, M.R. Shah

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision that quashed criminal proceedings against Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman, asserting that Rule 3.16 of the Vigilance Manual, 2008 was unconstitutional as it conflicted with the precedent set in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh. The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to established legal principles regarding the registration of FIRs in corruption cases. Consequently, the appeal by the State of Jammu & Kashmir was allowed, reinstating the FIR against the respondent.

The State Of Jammu And Kashmir vs Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman · Niyam