HAMID ALI KHAN (D) THR. LRS. vs STATE OF U.P. .

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the notifications issued under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, regarding the acquisition of land for a residential colony. The court noted that the appellants did not object to the acquisition process as the requirement for objections under Section 5A was dispensed with. The court found no merit in the claim that the urgency clause was improperly invoked, as the acquisition process followed the statutory requirements, despite delays in compensation and construction.