Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-03-01

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE vs TR. N. SEENIVASAGAN

Citation / case number
SC 2020/9117
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Respondent
TR. N. SEENIVASAGAN
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the appeals concerning the prosecution of Tr N Seenivasagan under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court examined the validity of the sanction for prosecution granted by the Chairman of TANGEDCO and the sufficiency of evidence presented during the trial. Ultimately, the court upheld the High Court's decision, emphasizing the necessity of proper sanction and evidence in corruption cases.

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE vs TR. N. SEENIVASAGAN · Niyam