Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-03-02

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. (DHBVN) vs M/S NAVIGANT TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2020/17590
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. (DHBVN)
Respondent
M/S NAVIGANT TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the commencement of the limitation period for filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the limitation period begins from the date the signed copy of the arbitral award is received by the parties, rather than the date the draft award is circulated. This ruling clarifies the interpretation of the limitation period in arbitration matters, ensuring that parties have adequate time to challenge awards.

DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. (DHBVN) vs M/S NAVIGANT TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. · Niyam