Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-03-03

SUBODH KUMAR vs SHAMIM AHMED

Citation / case number
SC 2019/23011
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SUBODH KUMAR
Respondent
SHAMIM AHMED
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Uttarakhand High Court's judgment, which had overlooked essential facts relevant to the case. The court emphasized the importance of foundational facts in legal disputes, stating that misapplication of law often arises from missing facts. The judgment underscores the necessity for courts to consider all pertinent facts to ensure just outcomes in legal proceedings.

SUBODH KUMAR vs SHAMIM AHMED · Niyam