Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-07-28

RASHI MANI MISHRA vs THE STATE OF U.P. RURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Citation / case number
SC 2016/35082
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RASHI MANI MISHRA
Respondent
THE STATE OF U.P. RURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether the ad hoc service of Assistant Engineers in the Rural Engineering Department should be counted for seniority purposes prior to their regularization. The court reaffirmed the principle established in Secretary, Minor Irrigation Department v. Narendra Kumar Tripathi, allowing for the inclusion of ad hoc service in seniority calculations. The appeals were disposed of in favor of counting the ad hoc service, thereby clarifying the application of seniority rules in this context.

RASHI MANI MISHRA vs THE STATE OF U.P. RURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY · Niyam