Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-01-20

IN RE: ADVOCATE ON RECORD INCLUDES A PROPRIETARY FIRM ETC. vs

Citation / case number
SC 2020/20805
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
IN RE: ADVOCATE ON RECORD INCLUDES A PROPRIETARY FIRM ETC.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether an Advocate on Record can register under a firm name rather than their personal name. The petitioner, Siddharth Murarka, argued that not allowing this registration puts him at a disadvantage compared to partnership firms. The court noted the unprofessional conduct in the petitioner's previous communications but decided to explore a solution to his grievance after he withdrew his complaints.

IN RE: ADVOCATE ON RECORD INCLUDES A PROPRIETARY FIRM ETC. vs · Niyam