Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-02-16

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LIMITED vs AMBUJ A. KASLIWAL

Citation / case number
SC 2019/30172
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LIMITED
Respondent
AMBUJ A. KASLIWAL
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal by Kotak Mahindra Bank against a Delhi High Court order allowing respondents to pursue an appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal without pre-depositing a portion of the debt as mandated by the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. The Court noted that the respondents failed to comply with a prior order to deposit Rs. 20 Crores, leading to the Bank's contempt petition. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in debt recovery cases.

KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PVT. LIMITED vs AMBUJ A. KASLIWAL · Niyam