Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-12-16

MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVIES LTD. vs MAHESHBHAI TINABHAI RATHOD

Citation / case number
SC 2013/10529
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVIES LTD.
Respondent
MAHESHBHAI TINABHAI RATHOD
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA, HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision to condone the delay in filing arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court emphasized the importance of ensuring that disputes are resolved on their merits rather than being dismissed on procedural grounds. The judgment reinforces the principle that delays in arbitration matters can be excused if justified, thereby promoting access to justice.

MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVIES LTD. vs MAHESHBHAI TINABHAI RATHOD · Niyam