Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-12-14

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. vs V.MOHAN AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2008/34445
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR.
Respondent
V.MOHAN AND ANR.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the necessity of serving a primary notice under Section 6(1) of the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976, to a convict whose property is sought to be forfeited. The court upheld the High Court's ruling that non-service of such notice to the convict vitiates the proceedings against his relatives, emphasizing that the convict must be given an opportunity to explain the sources of his assets. Consequently, the appeals by the Income Tax Officer were dismissed, affirming the requirement of notice to the convict.

INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ANR. vs V.MOHAN AND ANR. · Niyam