Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

august 2021

Supreme Court of India · 2021-08-03

THE STATE OF HARYANA vs RAJ KUMAR @ BITTU

Citation / case number
SC 2020/18226
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
RAJ KUMAR @ BITTU
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of remission policies for prisoners, specifically regarding the powers conferred under Article 161 of the Constitution. The Court upheld the High Court's directive for the State to consider drafting a fresh remission policy and emphasized the need for non-discrimination among similarly situated prisoners. The Court also reiterated the applicability of Sections 432 and 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure while adhering to the restrictions under Section 433-A.

THE STATE OF HARYANA vs RAJ KUMAR @ BITTU · Niyam